Melbourne 2017- impressions

8 days is hardly long enough to judge a city and certainly not insufficient time to pass comment on the people who live there so I will try to avoid too many sweeping statements in this reflection.

I’m writing this on my iPhone screen in glaring sunlight so please forgive typing errors.

There are some aspects of Melbourne that I have loved. The tram system makes travelling around as a tourist very easy. Within the city centre, travel by tram is free and the services are frequent. This has meant that we could get anywhere we wanted to go within 30 minutes of anywhere else.

Walking around Melbourne is significantly more relaxing than the majority of cities I have visited. There is neither the sense of pace of London or New York  nor the in-your-face rampant commercialism. The lack of road signs made getting lost a regular occurrence on the first couple of days, the grid system of roads made finding yourself again easy.

The architecture is fascinating with a mixture of colonial pretension, gold rush frontier facades and 21st Century glass and metal. In common with many cities, the docks have been regenerated to create smart apartment style accommodation.

Sport plays a bigger role in the cultural life of the city than anywhere else I have visited.  With  clearly defined seasons for Australian Rules Football and cricket, good weather and high spec stadia across the city, large attendances are enjoyed in every sport played (including the relatively woeful soccer teams).  The Melbourne Cricket Ground (referred to locally simply as the “G” -saying an acronym of 3 letters apparently too much effort if one letter will suffice) is as good a venue as anywhere in the world with its 100, 000 capacity, wide concourses, almost queueless bars and parkland approaches.

Despite a traditional masculinity associated with the country, women’s sport is taken very seriously, seems well supported and heavily invested in.

As with most big cities, Melbourne celebrates comparatively liberal values. There was plenty of evidence of a desire to celebrate diversity across the city. I grew particularly fond of the concrete anti-terrorist blocks which have been used to promote LGBT rights or stencil profound quotations.

On first impressions, this seems a city for the young (although, at 36,  the average age is the same as Birmingham) The suburb of Fitzroy both exemplifies the bohemian approach to life that exists across the city centre and also takes it to a level I haven’t experienced in other similar areas of UK cities.  An edgy frontier feel combined with a promotion of the arts and a roof-top cafe culture made for an interesting evening wander.

Partly thanks to the devaluation of the pound since Brexit, Melbourne is, at the moment, expensive for tourists from Britain. Everything is at least 20% more than in England and the impact on my pocket was felt particularly when eating. We travelled long and far to find a relatively inexpensive meal but everywhere paid between £12 and £20 for snacks (pizzas etc) and £25+ for any real food.  Even McDonalds appeared more costly in Melbourne because there was no “savers menu”. My personal favourite for over-priced food was a Fredo Frog in the supermarket for the equivalent of £1.50. On the plus side,  when eating vegetarian and vegan diets seem at least as well catered for in the city as in UK.

Another of the more obvious over-priced items in Melbourne is alcohol. Australian beer, while improving from the Fosters/Castlemaine domination of the market in the 90s, remains weak and tasteless and at approximately £8 for an equivalent pint is an expensive indulgence. As with food, we bought drinks in lots of places but found little variation in price.

Culturally, the city exists in an interesting tension between awareness of colonial heritage, the overwhelming injustice of its foundation and a desire to support something distinctively Australian and modern. There is an acceptance that the indigenous culture that was all but destroyed was more creative than the  imported European influence that followed. Popular music appears to struggle to move beyond a celebration of AC/DC and Neil Finn and therefore a great deal of UK music is heard in shops and bars.  Unlike the moribund music scene, Australian art seems far more confident and outward looking judging by the interest in the current exhibition at the National Gallery of Victoria “The Highway is a Disco” by New South Wales artist Del Kathryn Barton.  Melbourne also boasts a fine Centre for Contemporary Art on the Southbank of the River Yarra.

For all it’s liberal aspiration, Melbourne has obvious levels of inequality. Homelessness appears as almost as widespread as in Birmingham. It is a city that is built on and exudes both white privilege and post-colonial guilt. Along with many other cities in the world, Melbourne appears to struggle to share its obvious success with the poorer suburbs. As a result, a vibrant, young city excludes a proportion of its own population from the elements that create its success.




Teaching apprentices – not worth the risk 

Identifying a person’s potential to be a professional teacher has defied previous attempts to create an objective, systematic recruitment process. Subject knowledge tests, psychometrics, observations, interviews, formal professional references, character references, headteacher hunches and any combination of the above have been tried in different places and at different times. The only constant in the processes, the need for a degree, is now being jettisoned. This change in policy is not being introduced to improve the system but because schools cannot afford to pay qualified rates of pay even though those rates are too low and the working conditions too poor to attract sufficient teachers in the first place. 

Without an agreed system of recruitment,  schools, who now dominate teacher training, take a risk averse approach to identifying potential. This is justified because children’s learning is the end product and should not be put in jeopardy by poor teaching. The problem is that without a concensus over the best way to measure potential, headteachers’ approaches to risk will be subjective. At the moment, too often a young person is taken on to school-based teacher training because they are already known to the school. Sometimes, they are personally known to the headteacher. Sometimes, they are related to the headteacher. This “better the devil you know” approach is encouraged by government who see schools “growing their own” as the best way to recruit young staff. The blame for a failure to recruit can, in this system, be laid at the schools’ (or MATs or TSAs) door not the Department for Education’s. 

Teaching apprentices are just another manifestation of the search for a cheap workforce. It will be particularly popular with MATs who believe that they have a successful teaching formula (or even a script) that can be delivered by anyone.

Teaching is not a profession for everyone. Just because you have a degree does not mean you will have the capacity to undertake the distinctive  intellectual, emotional and physical challenge of being in the classroom. You need the ability to combine subject knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, understanding of complex human development and strong interpersonal skills. Taking away the degree requirement opens the door to more people who may not have the capacity to teach at a time when we have no concensus over how to identify those that can. The new criteria for selecting teachers seems to be weighted towards a willingness to work for relatively low pay, often as a gap year activity. 

We have had apprentice teachers before, in Victorian times with the monitorial system. That this was abandoned as a false economy, due to the low standards, is now conveniently forgotten. Nowadays, just as with the recruitment crisis, any fall in standards can now be blamed on MATs rather than the one step further removed Department for Education. Teaching apprentices are a political gamble that will backfire if the parental vote contributes to a government’s fall. The policy is also a significant gamble with children’s education every bit as dangerous to the life opportunities of an individual as the pedagogical experiments of dedicated traditionalists and progressives. 

The answer to teacher recruitment is frustratingly simple. It involves a long term plan to increase teacher training entry requirements based on an agreed criteria (to the point where people like me would not get on a course), courses would be rigorous and last five years and pay at the end would be at least in line with other professions (not solely for material well-being but because teachers’ status is crucial to successful systems). Such a plan would require a significant political and economic investment by the state. The question for politicians, and those who vote for them, is whether our children and our society is worth it. If we believe that teaching and learning in society is not worth the investment, we will continue to see ideological experiments, markets and short-term policy making blight education. 

Walking the teaching tightrope – implications of emphasising memorisation in primary education

In tonight’s staff meeting we were discussing Clare Sealy’s @ClareSealy excellent blog post on memory along with Dylan Wiliam’s (@dylanwiliam) TES podcast last week. This post is an attempt to organise my thoughts. 

Clare’s blog gives a clear account of the difference between, and implications of, semantic and episodic memories in relation to how we retain information. She argues, persuasively, that we should focus our teaching on semantic memory and, in doing so, strip out the pedagogy that creates episodic memory i.e. the many-hued resources for the complicated activity designed to teach a new concept over a one hour lesson. 

The problem, as Clare points out, is that the opposite (the monochrome, monotone, monotonous lesson) is also episodic because we remember the boredom, not the content. Emotions are never neutral and learning is never context free. That isn’t to say that we should ignore neuroscience. We have a lot to learn and intelligent application within our teaching will benefit many children especially, as Wiliam points out in the podcast, those who struggle.

For some children, the thoughts that overload or more accurately divert their minds are related not to the pedagogical devices with which we seek to engage but peer relationships. There is little difference here between adults and children. Our emotional state is tied up with relationship. Part of the human condition is to feel insecure about, and in, relationships with each  other. Children learn less effectively after a playtime because they’ve spent free time in the complex and challenging world of their peer group. Their memories of the day are episodic but focused not always on our exciting pedagogy but who said what to whom. In response to the children’s thoughts  being elsewhere,  we may teach in ways that keep their focus but don’t necessarily help store, and/or practice retrieving, new information in the long term memory. There are, of course, many other variables, beyond our peer relationships, that contribute to our emotions, the contexts of learning and the extent our episodic memories dominate our thoughts. These would include how much sleep, fresh air and exercise we have. 

In response to what neuroscience is telling us and what we already know, it strikes me that we have three choices. First, we can spend a disproportionate amount of time on social and emotional learning to try and help children become receptive to new information. Secondly, we can suppress children’s relationships and emotions within schools through contolled routine. Thirdly, we can seek to maintain a balance between development and memorisation that nurtures the child, engages through pedagogy and makes use of neuroscience to build long term memory in the learner. Another metaphor, alongside and related to “balance”, is of the teacher  walking a tightrope between pedagogical excitement and tedium. This tightrope is the third option above which will meet the learning and development needs of the largest number (but not all) children. 

For primary teachers, part of the  complexity of our work is curriculum design. Each subject we teach has both a unique knowledge base and way of applying that knowledge.  In every subject, emotion and imagination play a role once knowledge is acquired. However, the relationship between knowledge, emotion and imagination varies by subject.  To take an obvious example, to remove emotion from art is to downplay the humanity of the learner and of the subject. The same is true, in different ways, of maths or science. Just as, for a broad education, the differences between learners are as important as the similarities so the uniqueness of each subject is crucial in determining the way knowledge is stored and applied. With ten subjects to teach in primary schools, the tightrope of the teacher is that much harder to walk. 

Whichever way we look at our work, we must not lose sight of the children who face significant barriers to the process of storing and retrieving information in their long term memories. Increasing the amount of practice through tests and reducing the excitement in lessons may not support all children to store information in long-term memories. There never will be a magic wand for learning. Those children who struggle to store and retrieve must not be left to feel of lesser value. They must not be labelled as failures because this will feed a narrative of failure from a young age. Clare Sealy is a superb headteacher of a school that nurtures children in secure relationships. We all need to undertake teaching in all its complex fullness to be effective educators. In that context, applying the work of neuroscience is very important to the success of our children. 

ResearchED17- a few thoughts 

I was delighted to co-present a session at the ResearchED national conference yesterday. Although nerves and tiredness (it had been a long week at school and I got up at 5.30 to catch the train) prevented me engaging with the talks as much as I have done in the past, it was an excellent event on a number of levels. 

The conference brought a very large, sell-out crowd of educators together. Organisationally it must have been challenging and yet the whole event ran very smoothly. As impressive as the smooth running, was the demeanour of the main organisers (Tom Bennett, Helene Galdin- O’Shea and Alex Weatherall) who were their usual calm, kind and supportive selves. All three have the ability to focus on people and conversations in the present moment while no doubt dealing mentally with all the behind-the-scenes hitches every conference event throws up on the day. Unflappability is a great quality and Gladin-O’Shea, Bennett and Weatherall seemed particularly blessed with it. 

ResearchED continues to evolve as it grows. The aims published in the programme are now wider and the diversity of speakers and participants has increased significantly since last year. It also struck me that there were more sessions this year disseminating research. It is an event that attracts a wider spectrum of view points than most education conferences and that has to be a good thing for the profession. 

Twitter has been a big part of ResearchED but it wasn’t used as much on the day as it has been in previous years. In the sessions I attended, there appeared to be less live tweeting going on during talks which is a good thing because it suggests that more teachers are attending who are not on Twitter.  

Where Twitter continues to play a vital role is in connecting people online before events. There are several people I only see at occasional conferences but interact with regularly on Twitter. The development of, and challenge to, thinking that can happen on Twitter increases the interest and interaction when talking with the same people in real life. The conversation begins from a more advanced point if people have prior interaction online. As always, it was good to meet people from Twitter for the first time. I very much appreciated the supportive discussion I had with @thatboycanteach straight after our presentation. 

Twitter can also be of practical use;  with the significant and ongoing regeneration of Startford, I may not have found the venue if I hadn’t bumped into Rachel Rossiter (@rlrossi64) outside the tube station.  

Highlights for me were Kieran Dhunna Halliwell’s (@ezzymoon) and Dr Pete Bradshaw’s (@watfordpete) first session because, although Kieran and I have been co-researchers on a project, I’d not previously seen the results of their OU study on the flipped classroom. I wasn’t the only one interested in their work as the room was packed. Their research used videos of Kieran silently modelling concepts that could then be used for pre-tutoring at home or by individuals/groups using iPads during lessons. One of the most interesting findings for me was that the impact was greater on her own class than on other people’s classes. Coupled with the children’s interest in what the videos showed them of her home, the research highlights the continued importance of relationship in learning. At a time when artificial intelligence is being considered as a replacement for teachers, Kieran and Pete’s research is reminder of the wider aspects of education, learning and human development that will be lost when we are all plugged in and networked.  

Sam Sims (@Sam_Sims_) and Dr Rebecca Allen (@drbeckyallen) both work for Education Datalab who, along with LKMco, have produced some of the best data-based reports on education I have read.  Their session at ResearchEd looked at large scale US research on the effectiveness of teachers over time. Their conclusions included the importance of improving working conditions in order to retain teachers and improve the quality of teaching. As someone with responsibility for the working conditions of others it was a challenging talk but very interesting. 

Another highlight was meeting, in the presenters’ room, a teacher called Sergei who had travelled from Holland to speak. As well as being an expert on assessment processes, Sergei turned out to be a singer-song writer, published poet and a fluent speaker of 6 languages. I just sat there listening to him in awe. 

I chose to miss the big keynote speakers. Nick Gibb’s record as a minister shows that even by the low standards of politicians he is unable to engage with research outside of his own narrow ideological belief system.  I wasn’t upset to also miss Amanda Spielman, who, as head of OfSTED, speaks for an organisation whose crude use of data (to try and prove their high stakes inspection process is objective) damages education and has ruined the careers of many very good teachers. As research methods go, OfSTED have the least credible I have come across. 

I also chose, from the packed programme, sessions other than the Institute for Ideas debates because despite being very intelligent, articulate people their agenda of individual libertarianism says nothing to my understanding of education as a collective endeavour.  Their contribution to debate in the media demonstrates that people can be very clever whilst deliberately trying to deny a space for compassion in human society. It is arguably an example of the difference between being clever and being wise.  There are some worldviews that are so far removed from my own that I gain little from repeatedly engaging with. The Institute for Ideas have one such view. Having said that, I heard lots of positive comments about the Institute’s debates so the panellists clearly spoke well. I also heard great things about Martin Robinson’s talk. I have heard Martin a couple of times and he as almost as fine a speaker as he is a writer. I regret not seeing him along with many of the other sessions in the programme. 

On the way out, having finally relaxed after co-delivering a session, I was really pleased to see Jane Manzone. Although no longer blogging, Jane remains one of the most intelligent and analytical thinkers on education. She represents an increasingly rare professional – a teacher who combines educational expertise with significant and on-going experience. 

The profession needs a range of mechanisms to engage with, and contribute to, research. ResearchED as a concept has developed to provide such a mechanism and yesterday showed how far it had come in doing so. 

In our session, I promoted the concept of co-research because most of us are too busy to design, undertake and analyse studies on our own. Kieron and I have gained nothing from our work (neither money, nor status nor qualification) other than finding out about something in which we are interested. Having full-time jobs gives us that privilege. We are very different people who have learned, through undertaking a research project together, in a way that, for me, has improved my ability to think about education. I genuinely recommend learning to undertake research to anyone who wants to develop their ability to think through issues. Understanding research methodology and method through designing studies under the critical gaze of others is also a very good way of learning to engage with research at a deeper level. There is significant research expertise in University education departments and it was good to see it represented here. For teachers, working with University colleagues to learn to research is powerful CPD.

I would still research without ResearchED but it gave us an audience with whom to engage that we may not otherwise have reached. Many thanks to everyone who made it happen and everyone who came. 

The generation who will own nothing

My children persuaded me to take advantage of an offer of 6 months free subscription to Apple Music. For 2 days, I was in heaven creating playlists and listening to everything I hadn’t previously bought (and many tracks I used to own but had misplaced – all those empty CD cases I have cos the stupid things must be somewhere). On the third day, feeling vaguely dissatisfied and lethargic, I put the radio back on. 

There is far less emotional investment when the arts are so easily accessible. Even the downloaded music on my iPod required me to actively purchase and therefore make choices about what I really wanted to hear more than once. My free subscription (the only cost being that Apple will have data on what I like and therefore what else I can be sold) robs me of the choices I used to have to make. Owning record, tapes and CDs was once, in the UK, part of forming an identity. Music (and to a lesser extent books) are still an important part of people’s lives but when everything exists in the Cloud, our experience of music changes.

Some of the changes that are taking place  are for the good. The current generation find moving house easier as they have fewer possessions to pack and unpack. They may move house more often as the majority will not own homes. They may also lease cars rather than buy. In fact, we may be at a point where most people own nothing but still consume plenty: a different world indeed. It’s a world that whose cultural forms I’m too old to appreciate – now where are those CDs? 

“Full on idle” – summer reading

Having read, and been depressed by, Yuval Harari’s brilliant book Homo Deus, I have sought and partly found an antidote in Tom Hodgkinson’s books “How to be Idle” and “How to be Free” kindly lent to me by Jane Whitehouse, Head of Drama at the British School in Brussels. 

Harari uses the remarkable understanding of human history he demonstrated in his book “Sapiens” to project into the future. He foresees a post-humanist world where consciousness is separated from intelligence as life is determined by and dependent on algorithms.  Whilst he includes caveats that his analysis may prove false, he provides plenty of evidence that we are, as a species, already past a turning point in our history: the speed with which work is being automated is hard to ignore.

Humans used to participate in and define themselves through war and work. On the news this morning, there is a debate about ‘war robots’ highlighting the fact that people are no longer needed on the battlefield. Further, in peacetime our jobs are so specialised that we are easily replaceable in the workplace. Harari’s ideas are there for us to ponder now. We do not have to wait to see if some of his arguments prove true. 

Harari perceives religion’s role in history as  enabling people to see suffering in war, famine and plague as part of a cosmic plan. Whilst those three elements continue to haunt the poorest parts of our world, as a species, Harari points out, we are now more likely to commit suicide than be killed in war and more likely to be die from obesity than starvation. Long ago we stopped needing a God to explain events because, thanks to the industrial revolution, we have the capacity to control and overcome them. Harari provides ample evidence that in the biological sciences there is no cosmic plan just algorithms.

Humanism has focused on the feelings and experiences of humans as the ultimate justification for actions and those actions as a species, Harari argues, seek continuous pleasure and immortality. Whilst the latter is unobtainable, we may end up living for far longer as diseases are overcome. In this situation where committing suicide, being run over by a bus or killed by a family member are the likely ways of dying, we will become even more risk averse because we have a far longer life to lose. Within a longer lifespan, our pursuit of continuous pleasure will be through drugs rather than the restraint to the senses suggested by ancient wisdom.

Longevity and bliss (the things of the Greek Gods) will not be for all. Those who write the algorithms  that have the greatest impact will have the wealth. The rest of humanity, once useful for war and industry, will find themselves with nothing to offer the world other than data already harvested through our use of Internet search engines and social media. Politically, there will be no imperative to keep people healthy and educated. 

As we allow technology to merge with our minds in order to participate in the “Internet of things” where algorithms know us better than we do ourselves, we cease to be Sapiens and evolve into a new species. 

There are criticisms to made of Harari. He views humanity from a detached, neutral distance and describes us in sweeping historical statements that lack nuance but the quality of his writing and use of evidence makes his overall argument difficult to resist. By the end of the book, I was in equal measure  impressed, exhausted and depressed. 

That I’d been lent two books that provided another way of viewing the future was both fortunate and coincidental. If Harari is right in arguing humanity will have little value in the AI future then books that promote finding value outside of work may gain in relevance. The author of the “How to be Idle” and “How to be Free”, Tom Hodgkinson, has held the role of editor of the Idler and this has given him many years to develop and live out a coherent philosophy which seeks to help him avoid drudgery and dependence. His books provide a defence of minimisation of work and practical advice on how to live more freely. The books invite the reader to stop and think about how life is lived and the small steps needed to be taken now as well as see positive signs for the longer term future. The passages that resonate strongly with me are those on living in isolation. For Hodgkinson, the answer to many issues is a more communal way of living where we open our doors and share food, alcohol, conversation, work, childcare etc. The growth of Twitter and Facebook evidences a far more isolated existence, than promoted by Hodgkinson, where we want to share our lives at a distance. Twitter has become an emotional crutch for many of us as we seek affirmation for ourselves through constant virtue signalling without the need to engage in face-to-face interactions. 

Like Harari,  Hodgkinson draws his evidence for future possibilities from history. He is very positive about the mediaeval city states, the lives of Victorian artists, as well as the examples  of modern day figures such as Keith Allen, Joe Strummer and Penny Rimbaud (the anarchist group CRASS and their Essex commune get a number of favourable mentions). 

The medieval city states brought together relatively large numbers of people in cooperative relationships that Hodgkinson argues worked well to meet needs without enslaving anyone. He acknowledges the importance of the Catholic world view and culture that dominated Europe in promoting balance, freedom and enjoyment. Eamonn Duffy’s excellent work The Stripping of the Altars  makes an argument for pre-Reformation Catholicism providing a coherent way of life that fitted the rhythms and rituals of agrarian England. For Hodgkinson, an atheist, Henry XIII’s destruction of Catholic culture combined with the industrial revolution is the root of our current overworked, stressed and depressed society. A return to religion does not hold the answer for either Harari or Hodgkinson. The former dismisses religion as having, since the industrial revolution, been merely reactive in the development of the species whereas before it had driven science and culture (one of his claims that doesn’t actually stand up as it was the Catholic Church that provided the Big Bang theory). Hodgkinson likes the idea of public holidays and enjoyment that were part of Catholicism but is at heart a humanist looking to improve our experience of life. 

Harari  would have no problem  with any of Hodgkinson’s arguments for a return to a simpler life but from his detached viewpoint would see the tide of history taking us in the opposite direction with increasing speed. The individuals cited by Hodgkinson are just individuals. Although Harari argues history is determined by small numbers of well-organised people and not the masses, the Penny Rimbauds and Joe Strummes of this world do not seek revolution beyond their communes and campfires. 

Harari acknowledges the arts as potentially providing meaning to human existence but promotes the possibility, even here, of algorithms doing it better. Hodgkinson sees creativity in everyday life as the way out of drudgery. His examples of people who experience greater freedom are drawn from the arts. This is one of the strongest parts of his argument. 

Both Harari and Hodgkinson give some time to the issues of sex in humanist thought. Harari points to the problem infidelity poses when the human pursues pleasure judged only through the criteria of personal experience, enjoyment and feelings. The pain caused to others through an act of personal pleasure creates tension for humanist theory. For Hodgkinson the answer lies in occasional festivals where the bonds of monogamous human relations are temporarily suspended; it seems to me a very male solution.  

Most of the people cited by Hodgkinson are male. Many led lives of relative privilege from which the decision not to conform to the Protestant work ethic was cushioned by circumstance. Whilst Hodgkinson’s argument can stand on the evidence he provides, consideration of the gendered nature of drudgery and the impact of male pursuit of freedom on women would enhance the books. The musician Kim Deal provides a better example of living without constraints. Pursuing her existentialist and feminist philosophy, Deal has been lambasted for producing music so infrequently (her band The Breeders have managed 4 albums in 27 years) yet has lived a full life away from dependence on others including her more successful band The Pixies whilst being a carer to her mother who has dementia. One of her songs provides the title of this post: a song she used on two separate albums as it saved time. If, in future, creativity becomes more important in providing meaning and value to our lives,  Deal is a better an artistic example to inspire alternative living than many of the men in the books. 

As a teacher, the implications for education of Harari and Hodgkinson’s books are worth considering. The argument about whether education should provide young people with “21st Century skills” looks pointless. Whether the jobs of the future do or do not yet exist is irrelevant if the jobs are mostly undertaken by artificial intelligence. If we  are to be creative, we need a broad and balanced curriculum that allows us to live fulfilling lives outside of work. Harari sees the specialised teacher being relatively simple to replace by interactive computers but there are aspects of the learning relationship within a broad concept of education that may still require human input. 

Persuading governments to invest in such a model of education when the state requires only that people are connected to the Internet of things will be a challenge but the possibility remains of developing alternative forms of education within new ways of living. 

I recommend Harari and Hodgkinson without any hesitation. They challenge their readers to think about the coherence between values, attitudes and lifestyle in the context of a world changing before your eyes. 

For interest: a questionnaire on teachers’ perceptions of race used in a previous research project.

As edutwitter is debating race, this is a survey Kieran Dhunna Halliwell and I used in a project we have completed on teachers’ perceptions of race, culture and diversity. The project has finished and we are currently writing it up. Whilst acknowledging the limitations of social media, we’d be interested in the response on edutwitter although the analysis can not form part of our project. It’s a short anonymous survey